Critical Reflection as a Key Component of Personalized Language Learning in Digital Education Environment at University

Keywords: personalized learning, critical reflection, self-assessment, digital resources, foreign languages

Abstract

The article presents the problem of foreign languages personalized learning skills formation at the university. From the perspective of the issue, authors disclose an analysis of didactic conditions for the effective formation of foreign languages personalized learning skills formation. The main conditions are the skills of self-assessment and self-reflection, which help students identify their own educational needs, priorities, strengths and weaknesses. In the article, the authors offer their own understanding of critical reflection and the strategy of its formation. In order to obtain data for the analysis, the authors conducted a survey of foreign language teachers at the university, pedagogical observation of classes and analysis of literature on this topic. The research methods made it possible to identify key challenges that prevent the effective development of critical reflection skills. During the pedagogical observations, the authors identified and described in the article effective tools for the formation of critical reflection, in particular digital educational resources. It has been proven that the use of digital educational resources increases students' motivation for self-reflection and adds interactivity and multimodality to the learning process. The unity of didactic and technological approaches is a fundamental didactic principle, on the basis of which the authors propose to form the skills of critical reflection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Yuliana Lavrysh, National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute»

Head of the Department of English for Technical Purposes № 2, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor

Oksana Korbut, National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute»

Senior Lecturer of the Department of English for Technical Purposes № 2

Svitlana Buha, National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute»

Lecturer of the Department of English for Technical Purposes № 2 of National Technical University of Ukraine

References

Horbunova, L. (2013). Teorіia transformatyvnoho navchannia: osvіta doroslykh v umovakh «plynnoi suchasnostі» [Theory of Transformative Learning: Education Adults in Terms of «Current Times»]. Philosophy of education, 2 (13), 66–114 [In Ukrainian].

Ash, S. L., & Clayton, P. H. (2004). The articulated learning: An approach to guided reflection and assessment. Innovative Higher Education, 29 (2), 137–154 [іn English].

Gholami, H. (2016). Self-assessment and Language Autonomy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6 (1), 46–51 [іn English].

Kember, D., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., Kam, F., & Wong, Y. (2008). A four-category scheme for coding and assessing the level of reflection in written work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33 (4), 369–379 [іn English].

Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. (2017) Experiential Learning Theory as a Guide for Experiential Educators in Higher Education. Experiential Learning & Teaching in Higher Education, 1 (1), 7–44. Retrieved from: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/elthe/vol1/iss1/7 [іn English].

Mezirow, J. (2009). Overview of transformative learning theory. In Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists in their own words, ed. K. Illeris, 90–105. New York: Routledge [іn English].

Perry, L., Stoner, L., Schleser, M., Stoner, R., Wadsworth, D., Page, R., & Tarrant, M. (2015). Digital media as a reflective tool: creating appropriate spaces for students to become introspective. Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45 (2), 323–330. doi: 10.1080/03057925.2014.993237] [іn English].

Published
2021-05-28
How to Cite
Lavrysh, Y., Korbut, O., & Buha, S. (2021). Critical Reflection as a Key Component of Personalized Language Learning in Digital Education Environment at University. Pedagogical Discourse, (30), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.31475/ped.dys.2021.30.05